These last two weeks you have worked on your investigation process. Reflect and rate yourself using the rubric PLUS copy your response to QUIA.. Post with the subject INVESTIGATION REFLECTION. When you are finished continue with your 3 brainstorming design
I should be given a 3 because i'm working hard to prepare this slideshow and slideshare.
It is challenging to prepare the slideshow and slideshare these past 2 weeks.
and i'm also doing my best to make it clear enough for the 6th graders so they
can understand the design cycle ,and to make sure they don't have any problems
on the design cycle.
0 You did not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1–2 (60 / 70)You stated the problem.
You investigated the problem, collecting information from few sources.
You listed some specification points.
3–4 (75 / 85) You described the problem, mentioning its relevance.
You investigated the problem, selecting and analysing information from some acknowledged sources.
You described a test to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.
5–6 (95 / 100) You explained the problem, discussing its relevance.
You critically investigated the problem, evaluating information from a broad range of appropriate, acknowledged sources.
You described detailed methods for appropriate testing to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.
Type a complete paragraph explaining your rating.
I should be given a 3 because i'm working hard to prepare this slideshow and slideshare.
It is challenging to prepare the slideshow and slideshare these past 2 weeks.
and i'm also doing my best to make it clear enough for the 6th graders so they
can understand the design cycle ,and to make sure they don't have any problems
on the design cycle.
0 You did not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1–2 (60 / 70)You stated the problem.
You investigated the problem, collecting information from few sources.
You listed some specification points.
3–4 (75 / 85) You described the problem, mentioning its relevance.
You investigated the problem, selecting and analysing information from some acknowledged sources.
You described a test to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.
5–6 (95 / 100) You explained the problem, discussing its relevance.
You critically investigated the problem, evaluating information from a broad range of appropriate, acknowledged sources.
You described detailed methods for appropriate testing to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.
Type a complete paragraph explaining your rating.
No comments:
Post a Comment